"We do not hereby deny an aspect of anarchist history, in our separate ideas from the tragedies of the movement. However, it is not in our Interest, all that is "anarchistic" glorify, "our" past to be considered critical and polemical writing a story and sterile.
The important thing to try to make these lines for discussion is the relationship between history and a certain kind of ideological construction, which we perceive, in a revolutionary sense, as a threat.
When the civil war, as we said, spreading out across the planet on is loaded with barbarism, it is inevitable for us to emphasize the characteristics of such a war, its historical and ideological reasons, and the profound cultural and political roots that all visit the world originate in the crazy practices of the people in the war.
The understanding of the unfortunately all too obvious prerequisite to any form of terrorism takes us only in the opposite direction of an affirmation of our individuality is central to times of war. A fundamental assertion, therefore, conclude this statement without any conclusion. . And hopefully the beginning of a debate that is now more urgent than ever "
from the article:" On the individual responsibility "and here the
Editorial:
" This magazine is created from a common claim: based on the necessary Agitation of the daily struggle beyond to go to take the time to deepen our weapons and we schärfen.Weil to separate the theory from practice, because our desire for freedom as much from experience, as well as forged from thoughts, we do this post in a continuing provide social war. A moment that should be a source of ideas and not of opinions, a place that opened on the basis of specific contexts, again a common space for discussion.
But this magazine also arises from a defect: In order to read what we have not found anywhere to work out an anarchist perspective that comes from the individual in order to connect it with the daily social antagonism, regain the taste for Subversion, which has broken away from the classics of authoritarian criticism, even from the heterodox. In a word: To get rid of the policy.
to the editor of this magazine take companions from different countries. However, these texts represent no one and not to purport to. We publish texts on the basis of content, which we consider to be interesting, without necessarily share his form completely, nor to imply an affinity with their author. "
Issue 1 (May 2009]
here download
